Ibuprofen in the Management of Viral Infections: The Lesson of COVID-19 for Its Use in a Clinical Setting.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for the management of fever, pain, and inflammation. However, they have always been considered to have a double-faced role, according to their capacity to manage inflammation but also their possible reduction of immune system response and diagnosis delay. This last point could favor a dramatic increase of viral infection diffusion, possibly leading to a more severe outcome. The advent of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 excluded the use of NSAIDs, particularly ibuprofen, and then indicated this drug as the better NSAID to manage infected outpatients and prevent complications. Several authors described the role of NSAIDs and ibuprofen in preventing cytokine storm and modulating the immune system. However, the development of both adverse drug reactions (i.e., gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, and cardiovascular) and drug interaction recalled the necessity of prescribing the better NSAID for each patient. In this narrative review, we describe the role of NSAIDs, particularly of ibuprofen, in the management of viral symptoms, suggesting that the NSAID may be chosen considering the characteristics of the patient, the comorbidity, and the polytherapy.

Asthma Control during COVID-19 Lockdown in Patients with Severe Asthma under Biological Drug Treatment

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has deeply affected the management of patients with severe asthma, treated with add-on biological therapies. Objective: In this study, severe asthmatic patients on treatment with one of three different biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab) underwent a survey to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on the management of their clinical condition, with regard to the changes caused by the limited access to health facilities during the pandemic period. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 28 severe asthmatic outpatients referring to the Respiratory Unit of Magna Graecia University Hospital, Catanzaro (Italy), were asked to answer a telephone survey from May to July 2021. This survey included the evaluation of demographic and clinical data, as well as the number of lung function tests performed, exacerbations, biologic doses administered at hospital, or at general practitioner office, or through self-administration. Adherence to biological therapies before and during the pandemic period was also assessed. Moreover, the most recent asthma control test (ACT) score and the last forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) measurement, recorded during the pandemic phase, were compared to the pre-pandemic (baseline) period. Results: When comparing the pre-pandemic data with the pandemic observations, the mean ACT score and the exacerbation rate did not significantly change [ACT, 21.5 ±2.8 to 23.0 ±3.9 (p = 0.1);exacerbation rate, 0.3 ±0.6 and 0.5 ±1.5 (p = 0.3)]. When considering some variables related to disease management in the same periods, a statistically significant difference was detected with regard to the mean number of outpatient visits (5.2 ±3.8 vs. 0.9 ±2.5, p < 0.0001), as well as to the mean number of accesses to health facilities for the administration of biological drugs (from 7.0 ±3.4 to 2.5 ±3.9, p < 0.0001). None of the patients reported to have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and no adverse drug reactions (ADR) occurred during the study. Conclusions: The above results suggest that COVID-19 pandemic did not induce any significant change related to severe asthma control. Indeed, add-on treatment with biological drugs was regularly continued, despite the obvious limited access to health facilities.

Vitamin D Serum Levels in Subjects Tested for SARS-CoV-2: What Are the Differences among Acute, Healed, and Negative COVID-19 Patients? A Multicenter Real-Practice Study.

Vitamin D might play a role in counteracting COVID-19, albeit strong evidence is still lacking in the literature. The present multicenter real-practice study aimed to evaluate the differences of 25(OH)D3 serum levels in adults tested for SARS-CoV-2 (acute COVID-19 patients, subjects healed from COVID-19, and non-infected ones) recruited over a 6-month period (March-September 2021). In a sample of 117 subjects, a statistically significant difference was found, with acute COVID-19 patients demonstrating the lowest levels of serum 25(OH)D3 (9.63 ± 8.70 ng/mL), significantly lower than values reported by no-COVID-19 patients (15.96 ± 5.99 ng/mL, p = 0.0091) and healed COVID-19 patients (11.52 ± 4.90 ng/mL, p > 0.05). Male gender across the three groups displayed unfluctuating 25(OH)D3 levels, hinting at an inability to ensure adequate levels of the active vitamin D3 form (1α,25(OH)2D3). As a secondary endpoint, we assessed the correlation between serum 25(OH)D3 levels and pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with extremely low serum 25(OH)D3 levels (<1 ng/mL) and in a subset supplemented with 1α,25(OH)2D3. Although patients with severe hypovitaminosis-D showed no significant increase in IL-6 levels, acute COVID-19 patients manifested high circulating IL-6 at admission (females = 127.64 ± 22.24 pg/mL, males = 139.28 ± 48.95 ng/mL) which dropped drastically after the administration of 1α,25(OH)2D3 (1.84 ± 0.77 pg/mL and 2.65 ± 0.92 ng/mL, respectively). Taken together, these findings suggest that an administration of 1α,25(OH)2D3 might be helpful for treating male patients with an acute COVID-19 infection. Further studies on rapid correction of vitamin D deficiency with fast acting metabolites are warranted in COVID-19 patients.